LONDON. A deposition by Bill Gates in connection with the Jeffrey Epstein case has disclosed previously unreported details, prompting the British government to call for a complete account from United States authorities. The transcript, released late Tuesday by a New York court, describes multiple meetings between the Microsoft co-founder and the late financier, who was convicted of sex offences.
The document reveals that Gates met Epstein on several occasions between 2011 and 2013, primarily to discuss philanthropic projects. Gates stated that he was unaware of Epstein's criminal activities at the time, describing the meetings as "a mistake" and expressing regret. The deposition includes questions about Epstein's influence on Gates' charitable foundation and whether any financial arrangements existed between them. Gates denied any direct funding or advisory role.
British officials have reacted with caution, emphasising the need for transparency. A Foreign Office spokesperson said: "The United Kingdom notes these developments with concern. We urge full accountability from US institutions to ensure that all aspects of this case are thoroughly examined." The statement aligns with Britain's ongoing scrutiny of cross-border legal proceedings involving high-profile individuals.
The disclosure comes amid broader investigations into Epstein's network. US prosecutors have interviewed dozens of associates, including former executives and political figures. Legal experts suggest that the Gates deposition may provide leads for ongoing inquiries into potential facilitation of Epstein's crimes.
Gates' representatives have reiterated that he had no knowledge of Epstein's illegal activities. In a statement, they said: "Bill Gates has fully cooperated with all authorities. His interactions with Epstein were limited to philanthropy and were conducted in good faith." Nonetheless, the deposition adds to a growing list of public figures whose associations with Epstein are being scrutinised.
The British government's call for accountability reflects its position on extraterritorial jurisdiction in cases involving serious offences. While the UK has no direct legal role in the US proceedings, officials emphasise the importance of upholding international legal standards. The case continues to draw attention to the complexities of investigating networks that span multiple jurisdictions.
