A coalition of local MPs has formally opposed City Airport's proposed expansion to accommodate larger jets, citing concerns over noise pollution and carbon emissions. The plan, which would allow long-haul flights from the east London hub, has reignited a bitter debate between economic growth advocates and environmental campaigners.
Labour MP for Poplar and Limehouse, Apsana Begum, said the expansion would “pump more toxic air into our lungs” and disrupt communities already struggling with the cost-of-living crisis. “This isn't just about noise. It's about health, fairness, and the right to breathe clean air,” she told the House of Commons.
Conservative MP for Cities of London and Westminster, Nickie Aiken, argued that the expansion would boost trade and tourism, creating jobs in the capital. “We cannot afford to turn away business in a global economy. But we must balance this with our net-zero commitments,” she said.
City Airport currently handles short-haul flights only, serving business travellers and holidaymakers. The expansion would allow up to 9 million passengers annually by 2035, with aircraft such as the Airbus A320neo and Boeing 737 MAX. The airport says the new jets are quieter and more fuel-efficient than older models, but local groups dispute this claim.
Campaign group “Stop City Expansion” has gathered over 10,000 signatures against the plan. Spokesperson James Tucker said: “The airport promises economic benefits but delivers only sleepless nights and polluting skies. Our children deserve better.”
The debate comes as the government faces scrutiny over its aviation strategy. Transport Secretary Mark Harper has said the UK must “balance the needs of a modern economy with our environmental obligations.” A Department for Transport spokesperson confirmed that the proposal would be subject to a full public consultation, with a decision expected by summer.
City Airport CEO Robert Sinclair said the expansion was “essential for London's competitiveness” and that the airport had pledged to become net-zero by 2050. “We understand the concerns. That's why we're investing in sustainable aviation fuel and on-site solar power,” he said.
But for east Londoners like Maria Lopez, a mother of two living under the flight path, the promises ring hollow. “Every plane that flies over shakes our house. My son can't sleep. The noise is a constant stress. Where is the compensation for that?” she asked.
The expansion plan has also divided the business community. The London Chamber of Commerce supports it, claiming it will attract investment. But the Federation of Small Businesses warns that rising energy costs and supply chain issues are already squeezing margins. “We need sustainable growth, not short-term fixes,” said FSB London Policy Chair Sue Terpilowski.
As the consultation period opens, both sides are mobilising. Residents' associations are holding town hall meetings. Lobbyists for the aviation industry are citing post-pandemic recovery. The outcome will set a precedent for similar battles across the country, where regional airports are pushing for expansions against a backdrop of climate targets.
For now, the noise over City Airport is only getting louder.
