The militant group Hezbollah has condemned the newly agreed maritime border deal between Israel and Lebanon, warning that it amounts to a capitulation to Israeli interests. The agreement, which was brokered by the United States and finalised this week, delineates the exclusive economic zones of the two countries and allows for offshore gas exploration. Hezbollah’s leader Hassan Nasrallah said in a televised address that the deal ‘legitimises the enemy’s presence’ and vowed that the group would not be bound by its terms.
The UK government has reaffirmed its support for the agreement, with a Foreign Office spokesperson calling it ‘a vital step towards regional stability and prosperity’. The spokesperson added that Britain ‘stands ready to support both nations in implementing the deal and ensuring the benefits are shared by all’. The agreement has been welcomed by the international community as a rare diplomatic breakthrough between the historic adversaries.
But on the ground in Beirut, there is deep unease. For many Lebanese, the deal feels like a surrender to Israeli pressure while their own economy collapses. The country is reeling from a financial crisis that has wiped out savings, slashed wages and left thousands without jobs. The price of bread has doubled in the past year. ‘We are being asked to celebrate a deal that does nothing to lift the burden on ordinary people,’ said Rana, a mother of two in a Beirut suburb. ‘Hezbollah speaks for those of us who feel ignored by the politicians.’
The timing could hardly be more charged. With parliamentary elections due next year, Hezbollah is seeking to bolster its nationalist credentials. The group, which is designated a terrorist organisation by the UK, has a powerful base among Shia communities who see it as a bulwark against Israeli aggression. Its condemnation of the deal plays to that sentiment.
Yet the deal also has its supporters in Lebanon, particularly among those who see economic opportunity in the exploitation of offshore gas reserves. The hope is that revenue from the fields could begin to plug a gaping fiscal hole. But for workers already struggling to make ends meet, that promise feels distant. ‘Gas revenues won’t put food on my table tomorrow,’ said a port worker in Tripoli. ‘We need action now on wages and prices.’
The UK’s commitment to stability stands in stark contrast to the lived reality of many in the region. The Foreign Office statement spoke of ‘shared prosperity’, yet the gap between the diplomatic rhetoric and the kitchen-table desperation is wide. For families in the north of England, too, the turbulence of the Middle East can feel remote. But the cost of conflict and instability is felt in energy prices and supply chains. The UK’s own cost of living crisis has deepened in recent months, with inflation running at over 10 per cent.
As the dust settles on this deal, the question remains: whose stability is being prioritised? For Hezbollah and its supporters, the answer is clear. For the UK government, the task is to show that the regional order it champions can deliver tangible benefits to working people, both in Lebanon and at home.
