Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has directed the Israel Defence Forces to occupy 70 per cent of the Gaza Strip, a dramatic escalation in the ongoing conflict. The order, confirmed by senior Israeli officials, marks the largest single territorial advance since the start of hostilities. The move is intended to dismantle Hamas infrastructure and establish a security buffer zone, but it has drawn immediate international criticism.
The United Kingdom, through its Foreign Office, issued a statement urging restraint and emphasising the imperative of civilian protection. “We call on Israel to adhere to international humanitarian law and take all feasible precautions to minimise harm to civilians,” the statement read. The UK also reiterated its support for a two-state solution, though the feasibility of such an outcome appears increasingly remote.
The occupied area is expected to encompass key urban centres, including parts of Gaza City and Khan Younis, as well as critical infrastructure such as water treatment plants and power stations. Humanitarian organisations have warned of a catastrophic deterioration in living conditions, with over one million people already displaced. The United Nations has described the situation as a “humanitarian catastrophe”.
Analysts suggest that the seizure could fundamentally alter the strategic landscape of the region. Israel already controls Gaza’s airspace, coastline, and border crossings. The additional ground occupation would consolidate its hold on the territory, potentially as a precursor to long-term military governance. Egypt and Jordan have both expressed alarm, while Iran has condemned the order as “genocidal”.
The timing of the announcement is significant. Netanyahu is facing domestic pressure from hardline coalition partners who demand a more aggressive stance against Hamas. Meanwhile, the United States has signalled support for Israel’s right to self-defence but has also stressed the need for a post-conflict political framework. Washington has not yet commented on the 70 per cent seizure order.
Critics argue that the occupation is not only illegal under international law but strategically untenable. “This will entrench rather than resolve the conflict,” said a former Israeli general who spoke on condition of anonymity. “It will guarantee an insurgency for years to come.” The IDF has not disclosed a timeline for the operation, but initial phases have already begun with targeted air strikes and ground incursions.
For the civilian population, the consequences are immediate. The UK’s call for protection echoes similar appeals from the EU and several UN agencies. However, without a binding Security Council resolution, these entreaties are unlikely to alter Israeli military planning. The last such resolution was vetoed by the United States in December.
The story continues to develop. Further details on the operational scope and international responses are expected in the coming hours.
